Farah Heddar vs Martyna Zaremba Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Nov at 09:36 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Heddar vs M. Zaremba

ALG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

POL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Heddar 1 - 0 Zaremba
They have played 2 sets in total, with Farah Heddar winning 2 and Martyna Zaremba winning 0. The last match between Farah Heddar and Martyna Zaremba was at the W15 Monastir, 04-11-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Farah Heddar getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Heddar | 1 |
| Zaremba | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W15 Monastir(11-04-25)
F. Heddar vs M. Zaremba H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 34.09% (15-29) | Career Total W/L | 33.66% (34-67) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
F. Heddar vs M. Zaremba Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In recent months, Farah Heddar has won 33.81% of points on their second serve. In comparison, Martyna Zaremba has secured 33.08%. Could this slight edge in second serve performance favor Heddar?
- Return Game Statistics: While Heddar wins 52.47% of their opponent's second serve points, Zaremba performs slightly better at 55.91%. For first serve returns, Zaremba also leads with 32.77% over Heddar's 30.60%.
- Pressure Handling: Heddar has saved 46.84% of breakpoints, while Zaremba has managed 40.63%. Who handles game pressure better might be crucial during critical situations.
- Overall Performance: Over the past year, Heddar has won 35.90% of their matches, whereas Zaremba has a higher win rate of 41.18%. Does this indicate Zaremba's competitive edge?
- Surface Preference: Both players perform best on hard courts with a 38% win rate. However, Zaremba performs notably worse on clay with only a 23% win rate compared to Heddar's 32%.
- Player Level Comparison: Heddar has won 33.33% of matches in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, whereas Zaremba records a higher 42.42% win rate. Does this suggest Zaremba's greater consistency at this level?
- Opponent Quality: Heddar has faced opponents with an average rank of 163.38, slightly lower than Zaremba's average opponent rank of 160.74. Could this suggest Heddar's tougher competition?
- Deciding Set Performance: Both players have a 50% win rate in deciding sets over the last year, implying similar performance under pressure in tight matches.
Editorial Prediction (November 4, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent form, both players exhibit strengths and weaknesses that could impact the outcome of the match. Heddar has a marginal advantage in second serve performance and breakpoint savings, indicating resilience in crucial moments. Zaremba, however, shows superior return statistics, potentially complicating Heddar's service games.
When it comes to overall match performance and experience, Zaremba displays a higher win percentage and better adaptability on different tournament levels, which may provide a competitive edge.
Taking into account the slight superiority in match wins and return game efficiency, Martyna Zaremba appears more likely to clinch a victory in this upcoming match.
Farah Heddar vs Martyna Zaremba Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Heddar vs M. Zaremba H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 2:12:2 | Average Match Time | 2:12:2 |
| 82% (65/79) | 1st Serve % | 69% (40/58) |
| 57% (37/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (19/40) |
| 36% (5/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (7/18) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 30% (3/10) |
| 55% (32/58) | Return Points Win % | 47% (37/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Heddar Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q2 | W | 0-6 6-4 10-7 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-3 | ||
M. Zaremba Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q2 | W | w/o | ||
Q3 | L | 3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||

F. Heddar vs M. Zaremba Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.09% (15/29) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.66% (34/67) |
| 36.54% (38/66) | Sets Win/Loss | 34.55% (76/144) |
| 43.47% (439/571) | Games Win/Loss | 42.09% (830/1142) |
| 37.50% (6/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 37.33% (28/47) |
| 32.14% (9/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 23.08% (6/20) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 6 | Aces Total | 7 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 50 | Total Double Faults | 46 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 186.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 119.1 |
| 72% (534/746) | 1st Serve % | 63% (479/758) |
| 51% (275/534) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (240/479) |
| 30% (63/212) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (89/279) |
| 38% (23/60) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (39/83) |
| 39% (271/692) | Return Points Win % | 44% (331/760) |
| 35.71% (5/9) | Challenger W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 33.33% (10/20) | Futures W/L | 35.56% (32/58) |
| 34% (15/44) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 34% (34/101) |
| 50% (3/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (6/10) |
| 50% (8/16) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (10/18) |
| 64% (14/9) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (34/29) |
| 36% (14/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (34/5) |
| 20% (30/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (67/5) |